The author says sarcastically that blog's main topics - fashion, beauty and showbiz - are all there is to life. What is wrong with them? I like all three. My own blog mainly focuses on the irrelevant too. Does that mean I think there is nothing more to life than them? Why can't I focus on one thing without it implying that's all I care about?
I also like maths, ancient languages and history, computing and technology but I don't blog about them here. Just because I don't mention them doesn't mean they aren't important to me.
I realise myself and Sue are likely to be different, I work with maths and statistics and she probably doesn't. But our websites are going after the same readers. Girls who like some of the more pretty but unnecessary things in life.
The sentence in the article that really gets me is this one. Apparently the blog represents:
Surely all 'looks at womanhood' are selective? Why are only some bad? Ones that don't fit into a predetermined agenda? Where does a blog on beauty and showbiz try to restrict women? Can you not like these things and be successful in other areas too? As a successful actuary, I haven't been restricted by it.
I have felt I am a victim of this attitude throughout my life. I have been told I am doing myself 'a disservice' by watching trashy tv or reading the Daily Mail, given that I am intelligent. Apparently it's ok for girls who are not good at maths but not for me. I spend my days in work being intelligent, why can't I come home and space out like everyone else? Some people seem to think I should be reading academic journals at night.
People I meet sometimes say I don't look like an actuary. They are surprised to hear I work in something like that and not in something more silly or easy. Apparently because I wear make up and dresses, I am automatically not up for something like hard maths, or succeeding in the business world.
I had a great childhood, my mathematician father gave me jigsaws and puzzles rather than dolls. I was allowed dress how I wanted, including cutting my hair short aged 9. I read a lot and was encouraged to study chemistry, physics, become an engineer etc. I have a first class degree in Financial Maths. And guess what, my favourite website is still the Daily Mail...
The article's author mentions being disappointed SoSueMe conforms to a 'predetermined concept of female.' What is so wrong with this? My blog also does this, however, in other areas of my life, I feel I very much don't fit into the mould. Should I only blog about these aspects of my life?
What is actually wrong with liking make up anyway? Why am I made feel bad about it by other intelligent girls?
Whether it may be assuming women are all vacuous or thinking one who is academically intelligent shouldn't be interested in something pretty also, stereotyping of women is bad full stop,